The ninety-year history of the coveted cup has many such instances of its popularity being politically appropriated. Italy under Benito Mussolini had hosted the World Cup in 1934 to showcase his fascist regime and promote its policies. The authoritarian hereditary monarchy of Qatar could sportswash the world with the regime’s exploitative action and policies during the World Cup 2022. Nations like Saudi Arabia which will host 2034 event believe that associating with football will encourage the world to see the kingdom in a more positive light.
It is more than just a kicking game. There was little commercialization in the early years which now has become a money guzzling event. Making money was not a priority which now is the main motto. FIFA, the self-regulatory governing body of football, has cash reserves larger than independent countries like Kenya or Cuba. With the fan following for the game growing exponentially, efforts to raise revenues and increase profits has continued to expand. It is ‘a pleasure that hurts’, a poetic expression that refers to game both to the fan reaction who watches his team play and the despair over how autocrats mint money instead.
Sports historian Brian D. Bunk who teaches at the University of Massachusetts traces football’s meteoric rise as a game. Drawing on historical and contemporary events, from famous victories to backroom deals that now power the game, The Shortest History of Football shows how a game continues to influence global politics and economics. Although many people see football as an escape from everyday life, the sport has never been divorced from its share of violence and power. However, it is also enriched with both glories and tragedies.
The history of football is concise but comprehensive, revealing several aspects about the way sport has been played and understood. 1994 World Cup match between Columbia and the US is worth mentioning in this regard. Much to the dislike of fans, the Columbian defender Andres Escobar scored what is called ‘self-goal’. Little over a week later, Escobar returned home and was murdered by people linked to drug cartels. The tragic incident revealed the ways in which drug cartel had inserted itself into the country’s football culture. In addition, the repeated incidence of stadium deaths and hooliganism persistence haven’t been kicked away.
People are passionate about the game and results on the pitch have often led to tragedy. Such events are sometimes the result of deliberate acts and other times, sheer accidents. They make up the darker side of the game. Fans have grown strong attachment to certain players and have created interesting ways of demonstrating their allegiances. Bunk has profiled the best players in the game, from the Brazilian football star Arthur Friedenreich in the early 20th century to the best ever Argentinian player Lionel Messi in early 21st century, but wonders if the star players can win a game on their own?
From school football to club football, the game has come a longways. Women football has kept pace in emerging as an international event. While people wish that game remains separate from politics, the history of football shows it otherwise. Individual players and clubs are fighting to achieve such an autonomy, but national governments are using football as a tool to bolster the regime and policies, including right wing governments. FIFA itself has its own interests to bolster its revenues and influence.
2026 World Cup seems squeezed between self-aggrandizing interests of FIFA President and the host country’s President. While FIFA wants to maximize revenue as its chief bids for re-election next year, the host country is seeking to meet its political interests. Not without reason football remains the world’s most popular sport.
by Brian D. Bunk
Pan MacMillan, New Delhi.
Extent: 247, Price: Rs. 599.










.jpg)






